Monday, February 1, 2016

Paleomagnetism and the Proof of Continental Drift

Paleomagnetism and the Proof of Continental Drift

More than 1,500 years ago, Chinese sailors discovered that a piece of lodestone, when suspended from a thread, points in a northerly direction and can help guide a voyage. Lodestone exhibits this behaviour because it consists of magnetite, an iron rich mineral that, like a compass needle, aligns with Earth’s magnetic field lines. While not as magnetic as lodestone, several other rock types contain tiny crystals of magnetite, or other magnetic minerals, and thus behave overall like weak magnets. In this section, we explain how the study of such magnetic behaviour led to the realization that rocks preserve paleomagnetism, a record of Earth’s magnetic field in the past. An understanding of paleomagnetism provided proof of continental drift and, contributed to the development of plate tectonics theory. As a foundation for introducing paleomagnetism, we first provide additional detail about the basic nature of the Earth’s magnetic field.

Earth’s Magnetic Field 

Features of Earth’s magnetic field.
Circulation of liquid iron alloy in the outer core of the Earth generates a magnetic field. (A similar phenomenon happens in an electrical dynamo at a power plant.) Earth’s magnetic field resembles the field produced by a bar magnet, in that it has two ends of opposite polarity. Thus, we can represent Earth’s field by a magnetic dipole, an imaginary arrow (figure above a). Earth’s dipole intersects the surface of the planet at two points, known as the magnetic poles. By convention, the north magnetic pole is at the end of the Earth nearest the north geographic pole (the point where the northern end of the spin axis intersects the surface). The north-seeking (red) end of a compass needle points to the north magnetic pole.
Earth’s magnetic poles move constantly, but don’t seem to stray further than about 1,500 km from the geographic poles, and averaged over thousands of years, they roughly coincide with Earth’s geographic poles (figure above b). That’s because the rotation of the Earth causes the flow to organize into patterns resembling spring-like spirals, and these are roughly aligned with the spin axis. At present, the magnetic poles lie hundreds of kilometres away from the geographic poles, so the magnetic dipole tilts at about 11° relative to the Earth’s spin axis. Because of this difference, a compass today does not point exactly to geographic north. The angle between the direction that a compass needle points and a line of longitude at a given location is the magnetic declination (figure above c).
Invisible field lines curve through space between the magnetic poles. In a cross-sectional view, these lines lie parallel to the surface of the Earth (that is, are horizontal) at the equator, tilt at an angle to the surface in mid-latitudes, and plunge perpendicular to the surface at the magnetic poles (figure above d). The angle between a magnetic field line and the surface of the Earth, at a given location, is called the magnetic inclination. If you place a magnetic needle on a horizontal axis so that it can pivot up and down, and then carry it from the magnetic equator to the magnetic pole, you’ll see that the inclination varies with latitude it is 0° at the magnetic equator and 90° at the magnetic poles. (Note that the compass you may carry with you on a hike does not show inclination because it has been balanced to remain horizontal.)

What Is Paleomagnetism? 

Paleomagnetism and how it can form during the solidification and cooling of lava.
In the early 20th century, researchers developed instruments that could measure the weak magnetic field produced by rocks and made a surprising discovery. In a rock that formed millions of years ago, the orientation of the dipole representing the magnetic field of the rock is not the same as that of present day Earth (figure above a). To understand this statement, consider an example. Imagine travelling to a location near the coast on the equator in South America where the inclination and declination are presently 0°. If you measure the weak magnetic field produced by, say, a 90-million-year-old rock, and represent the orientation of this field by an imaginary bar magnet, you’ll find that this imaginary bar magnet does not point to the present day north magnetic pole, and you’ll find that its inclination is not 0°. The reason for this difference is that the magnetic fields of ancient rocks indicate the orientation of the magnetic field, relative to the rock, at the time the rock formed. This record, preserved in rock, is paleomagnetism.
Paleomagnetism can develop in many different ways. For example, when lava, molten rock containing no crystals, starts to cool and solidify into rock, tiny magnetite crystals begin to grow (figure above b). At first, thermal energy causes the tiny magnetic dipole associated with each crystal to wobble and tumble chaotically. Thus, at any given instant, the dipoles of the magnetite specks are randomly oriented and the magnetic forces they produce cancel each other out. Eventually, however, the rock cools sufficiently that the dipoles slow down and, like tiny compass needles, align with the Earth’s magnetic field. As the rock cools still more, these tiny compass needles lock into permanent parallelism with the Earth’s magnetic field at the time the cooling takes place. Since the magnetic dipoles of all the grains point in the same direction, they add together and produce a measurable field.

Apparent Polar Wander A Proof That Continents Move

Apparent Polar wander paths and their interpretation.
Why doesn't the paleomagnetic dipole in ancient rocks point to the present-day magnetic field? When geologists first attempted to answer this question, they assumed that continents were fixed in position and thus concluded that the positions of Earth’s magnetic poles in the past were different than they are today. They introduced the term paleopole to refer to the  supposed position of the Earth’s magnetic north pole in the past. With this concept in mind, they set out to track what they thought was the change in position of the paleopole over time. To do this, they measured the paleomagnetism in a succession of rocks of different ages from the same general location on a continent, and they plotted the position of the associated  succession of paleopole positions on a map (figure above a). The successive positions of dated paleopoles trace out a curving line that came to be known as an apparent polar-wander path. 
At first, geologists assumed that the apparent polarwander path actually represented how the position of Earth’s magnetic pole migrated through time. But were they in for a surprise! When they obtained polar-wander paths from many different continents, they found that each continent has a different apparent polar-wander path. The hypothesis that continents are fixed in position cannot explain this observation, for if the magnetic pole moved while all the continents stayed fixed, measurements from all continents should produce the same apparent polar-wander paths.
Geologists suddenly realized that they were looking at apparent polar-wander paths in the wrong way. It’s not the pole that moves relative to fixed continents, but rather the continents that move relative to a fixed pole (figure above b). Since each continent has its own unique polar-wander path (figure above c), the continents must move with respect to each other. The discovery proved that Wegener was essentially right all along, continents do move!